What we will not promise you.
Most of what went wrong for you last time started with one of these. Separately, there are three things the engine refuses to score at all. Those are measurements we will not fake; these are promises we will not make.
-
A ranking position
Nobody controls Google's index. Anyone who guarantees a position is either guessing or counting on you not to check.
-
A traffic forecast
We can measure what demand exists. Turning that into a monthly visitor number would be a story, and you would have no way to falsify it.
-
That you need us afterwards
The audit is a document. If your fundamentals check out, we will say so and you can stop there.
-
A number we did not measure
Every covered phrase names the page that covers it and every struck phrase names the rule that struck it. Where we could not measure something, the report says so.
What we do not offer, and why.
Five of the engine’s agents are not offered, because they would act on your accounts or measure nothing. Each one says which.
- Citation monitoringNot offered. Reading whether an assistant cites you needs logged-in sessions to ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini that we will not ask for, and it has never taken a reading, so we do not sell it. A different route, reading the AI answers DataForSEO has recorded, is built and priced, and switched off until we switch that paid data source on. What is offered instead, on Growth and up: Bing’s own count of how often Copilot cites your pages, from the AI Performance file you export from Bing.
- PublisherNot offered. Publishing to your site would mean holding its logins and acting for you. Approved pages are yours to publish.
- Cold emailNot offered. Sending email for you is acting for you, and we do not.
- SocialNot offered. Posting to your accounts would need their logins. What is offered instead: a check of what a shared link shows, and posts drafted for you to post yourself.
- Ad campaignsNot offered. It would spend your ad budget, and we never act on your accounts.
Fair questions, direct answers.
Is this AI-generated?
The audit’s findings are not. They come from a live crawl of your site and live pulls of Google's own suggestion data, and the report shows the page behind every match and the rule behind every exclusion. Software does the reading; the judgement about what matters is ours, and where a reading looks unreliable we flag it instead of quoting it. On the Growth plan and up, the app can also run AI specialists; what they write comes from a language model, and the app says so.
How is this different from an SEO tool subscription?
We sell both, and they are different things. The $149 audit is a document: the defects on your site, the demand in your market and the phrases your site does not answer, with the evidence for each, ready to hand to a developer. The self-serve plans are an app you run yourself, monthly, with the same checks and the evidence beside every finding.
What do you need from me?
Your URL, your market (city and country), and one sentence about what you sell and to whom. No logins, no analytics access, no credentials of any kind.
What if the audit finds nothing wrong?
You get a short report saying your fundamentals check out. That is a real outcome and we will not manufacture a problem to avoid it. A one-off audit is refunded in full only if it finds nothing you can act on; tell us within 30 days of delivery.
Who is behind this?
Quinndatum is run by Harpreet Singh Saini in Ontario, Canada, working Eastern time. The audit method is the same one used on our own properties first. More about who runs this · what changed and when.